Initial Designs
Design 1
Provide branching lines and binomial form structure. When the user types in one factor into a binomial, the calculator automatically completes the corresponding factor (in the other binomial) for the user.
Branching lines intended to support understanding of which numbers should be factors of a particular coefficient. |
Both designs have an answer-checking animation. |
Design 2
Design 2 automatically calculates factors of the first and last term in the trinomial. The user selects a pair of factors to use in the binomial using the up/down and left/right arrows.
Branching lines intended to support understanding of which numbers should be factors of a particular coefficient. |
After the user chooses a pair of factors and presses Enter, a check animation would be shown (Note: this is not functional in the prototype) |
Iteration 1
Design change: Drop Design 2
![]() |
|
|
Rationale |
||
| 3/4 students |
Most students mentioned that the lines and the binomial form were helpful. |
![]() |
| 1/4 users |
One user indicated that some students may assume the initial selection is the correct answer of the problem. It is also unclear which box is in focus. |
![]() |
Design Change: Provide less help
![]() |
|
Rationale |
|
| 1 teacher |
For design 1, calculating the corresponding factor might be too much help. |
| 2/4 students |
In design 1, when the user enters one factor, the corresponding factor is filled in for the other binomial. Some students appeared to be using this as part of a guess and check strategy (instead of strategically thinking of numbers and entering them). They ultimately gave up when they reached trinomials with first term greater than 1. |
Iteration 2
Design change: Immediate feedback
![]() |
|
|
Rationale |
||
| 5/7 students |
Most students could not factor trinomials with the first term >1. We took this as a sign that our designs were not as effective as they should be. One user said, “with this one, if you don’t know what you are doing it won’t help because it just gives you the factors", indicating that this design did not assist in the understanding of the relationship between coefficients and factors. |
|
3/3 users |
All users indicated that showing the factors was not helpful in solving factoring problems |
![]() |
3/6 experts |
Half of our experts suggested providing more feedback |
|
Design change: Don't automate factors
![]() |
|
|
Rationale |
||
| 4/6 experts |
Most experts are concerned about giving too much help for students. There is a trade-off between performance and learning, while performance is helping the students now, learning helps them in the long run. |
|
2 experts |
Two experts mentioned the importance of automating only the steps of factoring that students can do easily |
|
Iteration 3
Design change: Simple/Advanced Modes
![]() |
|
|
Rationale |
||
| 1/2 students |
Of 2 students, 1 found the lines
confusing and the other understood the meaning of the lines clearly.
1 of 2 students were not sure what to do with the first coefficient
of the trinomial. |
|
4 experts |
4 experts suggested to include modes with varying levels of help. |
|
2/2 students |
2 of 2 students mentioned that the checkmarks are helpful, so the checkmarks will be kept in this interface. |
|





